JustRightPD

During his campaign, Zohran Mamdani repeatedly claimed he would arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he visited New York, despite the fact that the United States does not recognize the ICC's authority over U.S. actions. 
This is the same mayor who refuses to allow the NYPD to cooperate with ICE because, he argues, New York police should enforce New York law—not federal immigration law. Yet he had no problem promising to use the NYPD to enforce an international arrest warrant.
And it's not just Republicans speaking out against enforcing this warrant, Democrat Senators John Fetterman and Richard Blumenthal are also against it. In fact, even Joe Biden rallies against the ICC's actions. 
Mamdani accusing Netanyahu of committing war crimes is not only inaccurate, his outrage appears highly selective. When Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi visited New York to address the United Nations, Mamdani did not call for his arrest, despite Raisi's long record of alleged human rights abuses and his reported role in the executions of thousands of political prisoners in Iran.
Likewise, when Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro visited New York, Mamdani said nothing, even though Maduro has faced allegations of torture, arbitrary detention, and sexual violence by international investigators. Instead, Mamdani criticized the Trump administration's actions against Maduro, calling them an act of war.
Why the double standard? If international justice should be applied consistently, why does Mamdani reserve his calls for arrest for some world leaders while remaining silent about others accused of serious human rights abuses?
Watch the evidence and decide for yourself.

America is at a crossroads, and the decisions being made today could shape the country for years to come.
In this episode, retired NYPD Lieutenant Paul Manicone and Sal Scarpa tackle some of the biggest political questions facing America right now—from Trump's military action against Iran and the growing divide within the MAGA movement, to the future of the Republican Party, the 2028 presidential race, election integrity, media bias, and the direction of New York and the nation as a whole.
We begin with the controversy surrounding President Trump's military strike against Iran. While many supporters believe the action was necessary to protect American interests, others argue it contradicts Trump's long-standing promise to avoid foreign wars and focus on America First policies. We examine whether the conflict could hurt Republicans politically, discuss Megyn Kelly's warning that the issue may impact the midterm elections, and ask whether the GOP risks losing control of Congress if public opinion shifts.
We also look ahead to the 2028 presidential election and explore who Democrats are most likely to nominate. Will the party continue moving further left with progressive candidates, or will Democrats rally behind a more moderate nominee capable of winning over independent voters?
The conversation then turns to one of the most debated questions in American politics: Why hasn't President Trump appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the allegations surrounding the 2020 election? We discuss election integrity, the SAVE Act, ballot security, public confidence in elections, and why so many Americans still feel important questions remain unanswered years later.
We also examine Donald Trump's unique relationship with the media and ask an important political question: Does Trump's unfiltered style help him more than it hurts him? While many voters admire his willingness to challenge reporters, defend conservative values, and confront what they see as media bias, others worry that unnecessary confrontations may alienate the independent voters who often decide elections.
The discussion then shifts to New York, where voters recently elected Zohran Mamdani while continuing to support Governor Kathy Hochul. We examine whether New Yorkers are contributing to their own problems by repeatedly electing politicians whose policies critics argue have led to rising costs, increased crime, illegal immigration, and declining quality of life. We also discuss immigration enforcement, election security, and whether New York is capable of changing course politically.
Finally, we revisit one of the most common claims made by Democrats and the media: that America would be better off today if Kamala Harris had won the 2024 election.
We discuss the border crisis, inflation, crime, military readiness, educational standards, gender ideology in schools, women’s sports, government mandates, and the broader direction of the country. We also examine whether the policies of the Obama and Biden-Harris administrations have contributed to many of the challenges Americans face today.
Throughout the episode, we ask the questions many politicians and media outlets refuse to address:
• Is Trump's handling of Iran helping or hurting Republicans?• Could Republicans lose Congress in the next election?• Why hasn't Trump pursued a deeper investigation into the 2020 election?• Does the media treat Trump differently than other politicians?• Why do New Yorkers continue electing leaders they often criticize?• Would America be better or worse off under a Kamala Harris presidency?• Who will Democrats nominate in 2028?
Watch the full discussion and decide for yourself.
👇 Let us know in the comments:
Which issue discussed in this episode will have the biggest impact on America's future?

rump's military action against Iran has sparked a major debate inside the Republican Party.
While most MAGA supporters continue to back the president, critics argue that support among the broader electorate is slipping. We examine recent polling, Megyn Kelly's warning that the conflict could hurt Republicans in the midterms, and whether the GOP risks losing control of Congress if public opinion continues to shift.
We also look ahead to 2028 and ask who Democrats are likely to nominate for president. Will the party move further left with candidates like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Elizabeth Warren, or will Democrats rally behind a more moderate candidate capable of appealing to independent voters?
If Republicans lose control of Congress, the consequences could shape the country's future for years to come. Is Megyn Kelly right to sound the alarm, or are concerns about Iran's political impact being overstated?
We also discuss the 2028 presidential race and whether Democrats will nominate another progressive candidate—or rally behind a moderate who could pose a much bigger challenge for Republicans.
👇 Is Iran helping or hurting Trump politically, and who do you think Democrats will nominate in 2028? Let us know in the comments.

If Kamala Harris had won, would America be better off—or would the country be facing even more of the same failed policies that voters rejected in 2024?
In this episode, Paul and Sal take on one of the biggest myths in American politics: the claim that a Harris presidency would have improved life for everyday Americans.
We discuss the open-border policies that allowed millions of illegal immigrants to enter the country, the record inflation that devastated working families, rising crime, government mandates, and the continued erosion of common sense in our schools, military, and public institutions.
We also examine the transformation of the U.S. military under the Biden-Harris administration. While military recruitment fell to historic lows and America's adversaries grew stronger, service members were being subjected to diversity training, pregnancy simulation exercises, and policies focused on social activism rather than combat readiness. Compare that to previous generations of military leaders whose mission was simple: defeat the enemy and win wars.
The conversation also covers taxpayer-funded gender-transition procedures, including support for providing such procedures to illegal immigrants, the push for gender ideology in schools, biological males competing against women in sports, and the growing pressure placed on children to embrace life-altering medical interventions at increasingly younger ages.
We discuss abortion-on-demand, the decline of educational standards, and how generations of students are being failed by a system that seems more interested in activism than academic achievement.
And perhaps most importantly, we ask whether America is still living with the consequences of policies that began long before Kamala Harris became vice president. From the Obama years to the Biden-Harris administration, has the country been moving in the wrong direction for over a decade?
The media continues to insist that Kamala Harris represented progress.
Millions of Americans looked at the border, the economy, the schools, the military, and the state of the country and came to a very different conclusion.
If Kamala Harris had won, would America be stronger today—or would we simply have accelerated America's decline?
Watch the discussion and decide for yourself.
👇 Let us know in the comments:
What's the biggest difference America would be facing right now under President Kamala Harris?

Four years later, millions of Americans still have questions about the 2020 election.
In this episode, Paul and Sal tackle one of the biggest questions of all:
Why hasn't President Trump appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the allegations of election fraud that continue to fuel debate across the country?
We also discuss:
🔹 Why some states take weeks to count ballots while others report results the same evening.🔹 The ongoing battle over the SAVE Act and election integrity measures🔹 Whether establishment Republicans are helping block election reforms🔹 Claims of voter fraud, ballot security, and public confidence in elections🔹 Why some states with large Republican populations remain dominated by Democrats politically
Whether you believe the 2020 election was completely legitimate, deeply flawed, or somewhere in between, one thing is clear: millions of Americans still don't feel their questions have been answered.
At a time when trust in institutions is at historic lows, should election systems be made more transparent, or are concerns about election fraud being exaggerated for political purposes?
Watch the full discussion and decide for yourself.
👇 What do you think? Why hasn't Trump appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election?

New Yorkers had a choice.
After years of rising crime, soaring costs, illegal immigration, and policies that have contributed to New York's decline, voters had an opportunity to change course.
Instead, they doubled down by electing Zohran Mamdani and continuing to support Kathy Hochul.
In this episode, Paul and Sal discuss whether New Yorkers are making their own problems worse by repeatedly voting for politicians whose policies jeopardize the safety, prosperity, and quality of life of the very people they claim to represent.
We examine Mamdani's vision for New York, his anti-police rhetoric, his opposition to federal immigration enforcement, and recent campaign messaging that promises to keep New Yorkers "safe" by abolishing ICE.
We also discuss the upcoming gubernatorial race and whether Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman has any realistic path to defeating Kathy Hochul in a state where voters routinely express frustration with the direction of New York, yet continue to elect the same political leadership.
We also tackle a question few politicians seem willing to answer: Why are Democrats so determined to keep ICE away from polling locations? The Trump administration has proposed deploying federal personnel to help protect election integrity, while state and local leaders are pushing back aggressively. Republicans argue that opposition to this plan jeopardizes election security. Democrats reject those accusations. So why the fierce resistance?
At what point do voters stop blaming politicians and start taking responsibility for the people they elect?
Is New York finally ready for change—or are voters destined to get more of the same?

For years, Donald Trump campaigned on avoiding foreign wars and putting America First.
But after military action against Iran, many of Trump's strongest supporters found themselves asking difficult questions.
Some believe the strike was necessary to protect American interests. Others worry it represents the kind of foreign intervention Trump promised to avoid.
In this episode, we examine the growing debate inside the MAGA movement and what it could mean for Trump's political future and the upcoming midterm elections. 
👇 Did Trump's actions strengthen America—or divide his own supporters?

Donald Trump has built his political brand on saying exactly what's on his mind — and for millions of Americans, that's exactly why they support him.
In this episode, Paul and Sal discuss why so many voters appreciate Trump's willingness to challenge the media, defend the American flag, put our country first without apology, and call out what they see as biased reporting.
But we also examine an important question: When does blunt honesty become a political liability?While the media despises Trump, their hostility toward him would likely be redirected at any Republican nominee in a future election. We revisit how the press attacked Republicans like Mitt Romney over comments such as "binders full of women," demonstrating that media criticism isn't reserved for Trump alone.
Long before Trump entered politics, Republican candidates routinely found themselves portrayed as out of touch, insensitive, or dangerous by many of the same media outlets that now focus their attention on Trump. Many of those same outlets praised Trump as a businessman and celebrity, only to become some of his fiercest critics after he entered Republican politics.
At the same time, while challenging reporters and exposing media bias can resonate with MAGA voters, personal insults and unnecessary confrontations may alienate independent voters, who often decide elections.
Trump's loyal MAGA supporters aren't going anywhere. But the real political battle is fought among independents and swing voters, and elections are often won or lost by persuading people who haven't already made up their minds.
Watch the discussion and tell us what you think:
👇 Does Trump's unfiltered style help him more than it hurts him, or does he sometimes go too far?

In Part 3 of this series, I share some of the most disturbing experiences I encountered as a police officer dealing with drug addiction and its impact on families.
This episode goes beyond the individual addict and examines the broader consequences I witnessed on patrol—from child neglect and exploitation to the devastating effect addiction can have on entire communities. I discuss real cases involving parents whose addiction became more important than their own children, including incidents that continue to haunt me years later.
We also discuss the policies and criminal justice reforms that have shaped today's addiction crisis, including drug decriminalization efforts, open-air drug use, early inmate releases, and proposals to restore voting rights to convicted felons. 
Drawing on my firsthand experiences in law enforcement, I explain why I believe these policies often have consequences that are rarely discussed by the people promoting them.
Whether you agree with my conclusions or not, these are real stories from the street and the lessons I took away from responding to them.
Part 1: The Hidden Cost of Legalizing Drugs
Part 2: The Forgotten Victims of Drug Legalization
Part 3: When Parents Choose Drugs Over Children
If you enjoy real police stories and firsthand accounts from law enforcement, please like, subscribe, and share.

In Part 2 of this series, we focus on the people who suffer the most from America's drug crisis: the children.
You'll see heartbreaking examples of how addiction destroys lives, traumatizes children, and even leaves newborn babies struggling with addiction from the moment they're born. Some spend their first days of life suffering painful withdrawal symptoms because of drugs they were exposed to before they ever took their first breath.
As a police officer, I saw the consequences of addiction firsthand. I responded to overdose calls, removed children from dangerous living conditions, and witnessed families torn apart by substance abuse. The victims weren't just the addicts—they were often the innocent people around them, especially children.
Supporters of drug decriminalization and safe consumption sites argue these policies reduce harm and save lives. Critics argue they normalize addiction and turn entire neighborhoods into places where drug use, overdoses, and human suffering occur in plain sight—often witnessed by children.
Who are the forgotten victims of these policies?
Watch the evidence and decide for yourself.
This debate isn't just about drugs. It's about the future of our communities and the next generation.
👇 Do policies like drug decriminalization and safe consumption sites help solve the crisis—or make it worse?